Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Smits v Loel (No 2) [2015] FCA 29 Citation: Smits v Loel (No 2) [2015] FCA 29
Parties: LEONARDUS GERARDUS SMITS v JAMES BERESFORD LOEL, PIONEER INVESTMENTS (AUST) PTY LTD and LILLAS & LOEL LAWYERS
File number: QUD 725 of 2013
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 30 January 2015
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 December 2014 (First, Second and Third Respondents) Applicant did not provide submissions
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Mr G Handran
Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Lillas & Loel Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 725 of 2013
BETWEEN: LEONARDUS GERARDUS SMITS
Applicant
AND: JAMES BERESFORD LOEL
First Respondent
PIONEER INVESTMENTS (AUST) PTY LTD
Second Respondent
LILLAS & LOEL LAWYERS
Third Respondent
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 30 January 2015 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the first, second and third respondents' costs of the proceeding on an indemnity basis. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate