Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex KFT [2015] FCA 62 Citation: Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex KFT [2015] FCA 62
Parties: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS PTY LTD ACN 004 762 341 v DELAP IMPEX KFT, ANDRAS PARADI, SUZANNE SZABO and AB ELECTROLUX
File number: NSD 844 of 2013
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 10 February 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – default judgment – operation of r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law – warranty not compliant with s 102 of the Australian Consumer Law – non-compliance with safety standards under s 106 of the Australian Consumer Law – knowing participation in contravention – remedies – injunctions – when appropriate TRADE MARKS – importing and offering for sale in Australia goods bearing trade mark – infringement action brought by authorised user under s 120 of the Trade Marks Act – consent of registered owner
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Regulations 2010 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters 1965 done at The Hague on 15 November 1965
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 4WD Systems Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 850 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chen (2003) 132 FCR 309 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1427 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (2007) 161 FCR 513 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] ATPR 42-290; [2009] FCA 682 Compaq Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Merry (1998) 157 ALR 1 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 Given v Pryor (1979) 24 ALR 442 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 425 Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd [2012] FCAFC 130 R v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia; Ex parte Pilkington ACI (Operations) Pty Ltd (1978) 142 CLR 113 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Limited (1986) 12 FCR 477 Speedo Holdings BV v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227 Trade Practices Commission v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd (1984) 4 FCR 296 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate