Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2015] FCA 70 Citation: LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2015] FCA 70
Parties: LHRC, LHRD, LHRE, LHRF, LHRG, LHRH v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION and AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION
File number(s): NSD 365 of 2014
Judge(s): PERRY J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2015
Addendum: 2 March 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where evidence is given at an examination by the Australian Crime Commission pursuant to exercise of compulsive powers – Where no privilege against self-incrimination at examination – Whether suppression orders necessary to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice – Whether entirety of proceedings and judgment should be suppressed – Importance of open justice
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 25A, 28(1), 30(5) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG, 37AJ Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 Brown v Brown (No. 3) [2007] FamCA 1639 David Syme & Co Ltd v GMH Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 294 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd v Local Court of NSW (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 52 SRD v Australian Securities Commission (1994) 52 FCR 187
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate