Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chintalapudi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 129 Citation: Chintalapudi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 129
Appeal from: Chintalapudi v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 2770
Parties: KIRAN KUMAR REDDY CHINTALAPUDI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: SAD 317 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Whether jurisdictional error in Court below – Where appellant concedes that criteria in cl 485.214 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) has not been met – Where the invitation to appear before the Migration Review Tribunal is limited to appearance by telephone or by physical attendance in another State – Observations on whether such an invitation complies with s 360, Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65(1)(b) 360, 366 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Legislative Instrument IMMI 11/068 Specification of Skilled Occupations, Relevant Assessing Authorities, Countries and Points for General Skilled Migration Visas and Certain Other Visas Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.03, 1.15I, 2.26B, Sch 2 cl 485.214
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 83 ALJR 1123
Date of hearing: 25 February 2015
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate