Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 7) [2015] FCA 137 Citation: Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 7) [2015] FCA 137
Parties: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 004 050 828 v REVLON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 095 360 731
File number: NSD 508 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 3 March 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend particulars – leave granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.51
Cases cited: AON Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Caason Investments Pty Ltd v Cao [2014] FCA 1410 Franklin v GHF Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1414 Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2012] FCAFC 15 Unilever v Revlon (No 6) [2014] FCA 1409
Date of hearing: 23 February 2015
Date of orders: 23 February 2015 3 March 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 52
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Cobden SC with Mr N Furlan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Baker & McKenzie
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Hall SC with Dr B Kremer
Solicitor for the Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 508 of 2014
BETWEEN: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 004 050 828
Applicant
AND: REVLON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 095 360 731
Respondent
JUDGE: GLEESON J DATE OF ORDER: 23 FEBRUARY 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate