Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chung v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 163 Citation: Chung v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 163
Appeal from: Chung & anor v Minister for Immigration & anor [2014] FCCA 2195
Parties: RANJIT KAUR CHUNG and KULDEEP SINGH GILL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: SAD 232 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Where Migration Review Tribunal finds application for visa provides false or misleading information – Whether necessary for visa applicant to knowingly provide false information - Trivedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 169; [2014] FCAFC 42 applied - Prodduturi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 5 explained MIGRATION – Where Migration Review Tribunal "cancelled" hearing on late adjournment application – Where no mention of outcome of consideration of adjournment application - Where subsequent failure to respond to invitation to comment on adverse information under s 359C(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) with consequential loss of entitlement to appear under s 360(3)
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65(b), 357A, 359C, 360 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2: cl 485.224, Sch 4: cl 4020
Cases cited: Kaur & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor; Prodduturi v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 1805 Prodduturi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 5 Trivedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 169; [2014] FCAFC 42
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate