Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 182 Citation: Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 182
Parties: JO-ANNE FINCH v THE HEAT GROUP PTY LTD, GILLIAN FRANKLIN, PETER KADLECIK, ADAM WHITE, JOHN SIMCOCKS and DARREN SCOTTI
File number: VID 73 of 2015
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Principles relevant to a stay – principles relevant to an appeal from a discretionary judgment on a matter of practice and procedure – case management considerations – overarching principle under s 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 24(1A), 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 41.03
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Mail Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc and Another (1981) 148 CLR 170 Alexander and Others v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) and Another (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BMW (Aust) Limited (No 2) [2003] FCA 864 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd and Another v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd and Others v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65
Date of hearing: 5 March 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate