Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schepis v Osborne [2015] FCA 192 Citation: Schepis v Osborne [2015] FCA 192
Appeal from: Osborne & Ors v Schepis [2014] FCCA 531
Parties: ASHLEY MARIE SCHEPIS v KEITH ROBERTSON OSBORNE, NICHOLAS JOHN SATOURIS and ANDREW MICHAEL CHRISTOPOULOS
File number: QUD 88 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – denial of procedural fairness – sequestration order made by registrar in appellant's absence – Federal Circuit Court required to conduct de novo review – appellant afforded no reasonable opportunity to make submissions on review – judgment set aside BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – appeal against judgment of Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for review of sequestration order – costs order against appellant – solicitor for appellant ordered to indemnify appellant – indemnification not forthcoming – bankruptcy notice served on appellant – sequestration order made by registrar – review required to be conducted de novo – no reasonable opportunity to make submissions – judgment set aside
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 27, 43(1), 52 and 60(2) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) ss 102(2) and 104 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 20.03 Federal Circuit Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006 (Cth) r 2.02
Cases cited: Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) (1987) 76 ALR 137 cited Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 cited De Sousa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 544 cited Dobbie v Department of Social Security [1995] FCA 303 cited Edwards v Edwards [1958] P 235 cited Hamilton v Warne (1907) 4 CLR 1293 cited Martin v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2001) 217 ALR 634 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 cited Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282 cited Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR at 141 cited Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 cited SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 cited SZRUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 216 FCR 445 cited The Queen v Conciliation & Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Angliss (1969) 122 CLR 546 cited The Queen v Windridge, Ex parte Pacific Coal Pty Ltd [1992] 2 Qd R 180 cited Totev v Sfar (2008) 167 FCR 193 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate