Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
J & A Vaughan Super Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Becton Property Group Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 218 Citation: J & A Vaughan Super Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Becton Property Group Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 218
Parties: J & A VAUGHAN SUPER PTY LTD (TRUSTEE) v BECTON PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 095 067 771) and HAMISH EION MACDONALD
File number: VID 1226 of 2013
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – Applications for costs following successful application for leave to amend pleading – where respondent to application had brought unsuccessful summary judgment application – where respondent had successfully applied to set aside notice to produce issued by applicant.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.53
Cases cited: Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd [2010] FCA 739 J & A Vaughan Super Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Becton Property Group Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 1380 Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Ltd (No 6) [2009] FCA 1319 Microsoft Corporation v CX Computer Pty Ltd (2002) 116 FCR 372 Owen v Musladin (No 2) [2010] ACTCA 24 Petar v Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 142 Public Trustee v Nash (1921) 38 WN (NSW) 142 Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Servcorp Ltd v Nuclei Ltd [2011] FCA 1229 Whitehall Holdings Pty Ltd v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (Unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Ipp, Pidgeon and Owen JJ, 19 June 1992)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate