Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 220 Citation: Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 220
Appeal from: Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCCA 2343
Parties: HARWINDER SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: SAD 1 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Practice and procedure – Where Minister seeks to uphold decision of Court below on a different ground – Where no notice of contention filed before hearing – Where appellant unrepresented, not fluent in English and relevant provisions complex – Where error by Court below not material MIGRATION – Practice and procedure – Where question on judicial review is compliance with objective precondition, compliance with rules of evidence is required - Where Minister relies on computer print-out as evidence of transmission of email and attachments under ss 71 and 161 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – Whether computer print-out of email is sufficient proof that attachments were sent – Observations on approach to proof of such matters in cases involving unrepresented litigants MIGRATION – Where objective precondition to Tribunal's jurisdiction to entertain review - Where appellant had 21 days to lodge application for review – Where time does not commence to run until Minister has complied with obligation to notify of delegate's decision - Where appellant alleges no notification was received - Whether notification of decision was "received" for the purposes of reg 4.10(1)(a) despite no actual receipt
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate