Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZUTE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 231 Citation: SZUTE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 231
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: SZUTE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCCA 2927
Parties: SZUTE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 1337 of 2014
Judge(s): GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal – where application for judicial review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision dismissed – where Tribunal made adverse credibility findings – where applicant provided documents supporting claim to Tribunal – whether the Tribunal erred in relation to the applicant's involvement in politics in Bangladesh – whether the Tribunal erred in giving documents no weight – no jurisdictional error identified – application refused
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r 44.12 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 36(2)
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14 at [197]; (1999) 197 CLR 510 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47; (2000) 203 CLR 194 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Eltran Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1988] FCA 398; (1988) 32 FCR 195 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; (2000) 104 FCR 564 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNSP [2010] FCAFC 50; (2010) 184 FCR 485 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; (1999) 197 CLR 611 Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 MZXGP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1075 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 198 ALR 59 Russo v Aiello [2003] HCA 53; (2003) 215 CLR 643 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; (2011) 217 FCR 238 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40; (1994) 181 CLR 201 WAJQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1580
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate