Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tax Practitioners Board v Li [2015] FCA 233 Citation: Tax Practitioners Board v Li [2015] FCA 233
Parties: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD v CHENG CHENG LI
File number: NSD 8 of 2014
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2015
Catchwords: CIVIL PENALTIES – quantum – applicant contravened Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) s 50-20 by recklessly making false, incorrect or misleading statements to Commissioner of Taxation – relevant considerations in fixing appropriate penalty – statements not deliberately or knowingly false – no intention to mislead Commissioner – tax agent registration terminated as result of conduct – loss caused to Commonwealth – inconvenience to taxpayers – specific deterrence – general deterrence – admission of contraventions prior to hearing – totality principle – proportionality of penalty to objective seriousness of contravening conduct – parity principle
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 40-5, 40-25, 50-5, 50-20, 50-35, 60-125 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2011] FCA 810 cited Australian Communications and Media Authority v Clarity1 Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) (2006) 155 FCR 377 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2) (2002) 190 ALR 169 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL Sales Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1360 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v High Adventure Pty Limited (2006) ATPR 42-091 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 cited Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560 cited BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2014] FCA 193 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor v Cahill (2010) 269 ALR 1 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor v Williams (2009) 262 ALR 417 cited Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 cited General Manager of Fair Work Australia v Health Services Union [2013] FCA 1306 cited Kaye v Vagg (No 2) (1984) 11 A Crim R 127 cited Kelly v Fitzpatrick [2007] FCA 1080 cited Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 cited Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan (2008) 168 FCR 383 cited Plancor Pty Ltd v Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union (2008) 171 FCR 357 cited R v Jamieson (1975) 60 Cr App R 318 cited Rahme v R (1989) 43 A Crim R (S) 81 cited Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249 cited Tax Practitioners Board v Dedic [2014] FCA 511 cited Tax Practitioners Board v Su [2014] FCA 731 followed Trade Practices Commissioner v CSR Ltd (1991) ATPR 41-076 cited Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate