Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Donoghue v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 235 Citation: Donoghue v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 235
Parties: GARRY JOHN DONOGHUE v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION GARRY JOHN DONOGHUE V COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: QUD 353 of 2012 QUD 360 of 2013
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2015
Corrigendum: 2 April 2015
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – notices of assessment issued to applicant pursuant to audit conducted by respondent – application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for orders declaring assessments invalid and quashing them – injunction – source of information – where audit performed and assessments made with the benefit of material provided by third party individual without applicant's permission – whether third party material subject to legal professional privilege – state of knowledge of respondent – whether there was conscious misuse of privileged material Held: third party worked to or for law firm with which the applicant had a retainer – alternatively third party acted as applicant's agent for the purposes of applicant's dealing with law firm – communications and documents made for dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice or for use in litigation and were therefore subject to legal professional privilege – respondent held apprehension that this was the case – material assisted respondent's train of inquiry and in process of making assessments – no right given by s 166 or s 263 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) to Commissioner to use material which is subject to legal professional privilege – element of recklessness in process of assessment sufficient to amount to conscious maladministration as described in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 146 – assessment quashed – respondent restrained from using third party material
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate