Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Roberts v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 238 Citation: Roberts v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 238
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Roberts v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCA 1108
Parties: REGINALD GEORGE ROBERTS v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: SAD 344 of 2013
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2015
Date of hearing: 24 March 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 47
Counsel for the Appellant: R Ross Smith
Solicitor for the Appellant: Townsends Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: S Linden
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Taxation Office Dispute Resolution
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 344 of 2013
BETWEEN: REGINALD GEORGE ROBERTS
Applicant
AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 19 MARCH 2015 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal from the order of the Court made on 29 October 2013 is refused. 2. The applicant pay to the respondent costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 344 of 2013
BETWEEN: REGINALD GEORGE ROBERTS
Applicant
AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE: 19 MARCH 2015 PLACE: ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate