Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 244 Citation: Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 244
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2014] FCA 1130
Parties: IGOR GRABOVSKY v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1301 of 2014
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 20 March 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal – whether acceptable explanation for delay – whether proposed appeal has any merit
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 43(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 36.03 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 344, 345, 347, 349, 730A; Pt 3.2, Div 10 Legal Profession Regulation 2005 (NSW), cl 118 Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth), ss 39(1), 41, 42; Pt 4, Divs 2, 3, 5; Sch 2, cl 4(1) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 94(1)
Cases cited: ActewAGL Distribution v Australian Energy Regulator (2011) 195 FCR 142 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Gallo v Dawson (1990) 93 ALR 479; [1990] HCA 30 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jia v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 84 FCR 87 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Mladenov v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCA 12 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate