Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Beling v Sixty International S.A. [2015] FCA 250 Citation: Beling v Sixty International S.A. [2015] FCA 250
Parties: JOEL BELING v SIXTY INTERNATIONAL S.A.
File number: VID 626 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 20 March 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – Appeal from Registrar of Trademarks' decision as to costs – litigant in person – solicitor litigant exception to principle that successful self-represented litigants not entitled to costs – applicability of exception to awards of costs under Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 54, 56, 201, 202, 203, 206, 221, 222 Trade Mark Regulations 1995 (Cth) Pt 5, regs 21.12, 21.13(1), 21.15, Sch 8
Cases cited: A & D Douglas Pty Ltd v Lawyers Private Mortgages Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 690 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Cashman and Partners v Secretary, Department of Human Services and Health (1995) 61 FCR 301 Dobree v Hoffman (1996) 18 WAR 36 George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 71 Guss v Veenhuizen (No 2) (1976) 136 CLR 47 Re New Tel Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2008] FCA 1085 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365; [1999] FCA 1020 Secretary, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade v Boswell (No 2) (1992) 39 FCR 288 Tyne v UBS AG (No 2) [2014] FCA 1228 R v Hardie [2003] NZIPOTM 39
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate