Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Craven v Ready Flowers Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 297 Citation: Craven v Ready Flowers Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 297
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Craven v Ready Flowers Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] FMCA 1128
Parties: GORDON CRAVEN v READY FLOWERS PTY LTD ACN 115 489 480 READY FLOWERS PTY LTD ACN 115 489 480 v GORDON CRAVEN
File numbers: QUD 156 of 2014 QUD 251 of 2014
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2015
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where applicant applied for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia – application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs – order for costs as taxed forms basis for bankruptcy notice – whether the circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court's discretion under s 52(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to not accept the Federal Court's costs order as proof of the debt concerned and therefore not make a sequestration order against applicant's estate – whether director of the respondent gave false evidence before the Federal Magistrates Court and perpetuated a fraud on the Federal Court such as to amount to a perversion of the course of justice – alleged deliberate omission of evidence as to payment arrangements between respondent and entity to whom the respondent's business was sold – whether leave application before this Court determined on a premise known by the respondent to be false – whether fraud proved on the balance of probabilities Held: fraud and perversion of justice not proved – costs judgments was evidence of debt in reality – sequestration order made CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – parliamentary privilege – evidence on which applicant sought to rely included right of reply statement given by director's wife to the Australian Senate subject to parliamentary privilege under s 16 of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) – statement inadmissible as its use would impeach a question of proceeding in Parliament
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate