Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 333 Citation: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 333
Parties: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD and JAMIE DUNSMORE v DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD and JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2015
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – admissibility – paragraphs of affidavit by Director of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry analysing medical data at three hospitals – data held by the Australian Orthopaedic Association Limited – underlying data not provided to respondents – statutory prohibition on disclosure of certain information except where information does not identify, either expressly or by implication, a particular individual or individuals – where deponent of affidavit had access to the underlying data by virtue of his office – fairness to other parties – late production of analysis or re-analysis of underlying data Held: application to read the balance of paragraphs 90 to 93 of the affidavit refused
Legislation: Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) s 124Y
Cases cited: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 325
Date of hearing: 10 April 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D Graham SC with Mr NM Bender and Ms T Stevens
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate