Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 338 Citation: Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 338
Parties: MUHAMMED ALI SAYED v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
File number: VID 1072 of 2013
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2015
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – penalties – adverse action because of employee's political opinion – three contraventions of s 351 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether contraventions formed one course of conduct – relevant factors in assessment of penalties – seriousness of contraventions – discrimination on basis of political opinion to be subject to strong disapproval – "common informer" rationale for payment of penalties to particular persons or organisations under Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 546(3) – whether penalties and compensation should be ordered to be paid to the same person
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 351, 539, 545, 546, 546(3), 557(1), 570
Cases cited: AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111; [1999] HCA 46 Attorney-General (SA) v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560; [2008] FCAFC 8 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill (2010) 194 IR 461; [2010] FCAFC 39 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Williams (2009) 262 ALR 417; [2009] FCAFC 171 CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Limited (2001) 108 IR 228; [2001] FCA 1364 Dafallah v Fair Work Commission (2014) 225 FCR 559; [2014] FCA 328 Fair Work Ombudsman v Australian Shooting Academy Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1064 Fair Work Ombudsman v Maclean Bay Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 557 Fair Work Ombudsman v Skilled Offshore (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 275 Fair Work Ombudsman v W.K.O. Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1129 Gibbs v The Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of City of Altona (1992) 37 FCR 216 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 205 ALR 346; [2004] HCA 15 Kelly v Fitzpatrick (2007) 166 IR 14; [2007] FCA 1080 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mason v Harrington Corporation Pty Ltd [2007] FMCA 7 McIlwain v Ramsey Food Packaging Pty Ltd (No 4) (2006) 158 IR 181; [2006] FCA 1302 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan (2008) 168 FCR 383; [2008] FCAFC 70 Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd (No 2) (2013) 221 FCR 118; [2013] FCA 1146 National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (2013) 234 IR 139; [2013] FCA 451 Plancor Pty Ltd v Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union (2008) 171 FCR 357; [2008] FCAFC 170 QR Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (2010) 204 IR 142; [2010] FCAFC 150 R v Faulkner (1972) 56 Cr App R 594 R v Knight (1981) 26 SASR 573 Royer v Western Australia (2009) 197 A Crim R 319; [2009] WASCA 139 Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 27 Schanka v Employment National (Administration) Pty Ltd (No 2) (2001) 114 FCR 379; [2001] FCA 1623 Seymour v Stawell Timber Industries Pty Ltd (1985) 9 FCR 241; (1985) 13 IR 289 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate