Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 5) [2015] FCA 340 Citation: Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 5) [2015] FCA 340
Parties: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD and JAMIE DUNSMORE v DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD and JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2015
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135
Dates of hearing: 10 and 13 April 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Sheahan QC with Mr D Graham SC and Mr NM Bender
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
Solicitor for the Second Applicant: Shine Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Dick SC with Mr DJ Barnett
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Norton Rose Fulbright
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 213 of 2011
BETWEEN: TAMMY MAREE STANFORD
First Applicant
JAMIE DUNSMORE
Second Applicant
AND: DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LTD
First Respondent
JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 13 APRIL 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The introductory two lines, the subheading "Outline of presentation" and the numbered paragraphs after that subheading of the Outline of proposed oral evidence of Professor Athanasou (the Outline) be rejected. 2. The final sentence of the Outline be rejected. 3. The balance of the Outline be admitted. 4. The following slides in the PowerPoint that accompanies the Outline be rejected: 3, 4 as to the diagram and text referable to edge loading, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 20, 24, 26-28 32 and 33. 5. The following slides in the PowerPoint that accompanies the Outline be admitted: 1, 2, 4 apart from the diagram and text referable to edge loading, 7-9, 12, 14, 16-19, 21-23, 25, 29-31, 34-58. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate