Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 342 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 342
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v ACTIVESUPER PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 125 423 574 AND ORS
File number: VID 426 of 2012
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 14 April 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – contraventions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – elements of primary contraventions – attribution of knowledge and/or conduct to other defendants – s 726 (offering securities in a non-existent company) – s 727 (offering securities without disclosure document) – whether offering in Australia of shares in companies incorporated in British Virgin Islands requires disclosure – s 911A(1) (unlicensed provision of financial services) – whether offering of advice and services in relation to Self-Managed Superannuation Funds and investment by those SMSFs was authorised – s 1041H(1) and s 12DA of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (misleading or deceptive conduct) – whether statements in prospectuses as to the use to which monies invested in the BVI companies would be put were misleading CORPORATIONS – accessorial liability – whether persons "knowingly concerned" in contraventions of Corporations Act – establishing actual knowledge by inference – whether accessory to s 727 contravention must know that offers required disclosure – whether accessory to s 1041H contravention must know that representations were false or misleading – attribution of knowledge and/or conduct to other defendants CORPORATIONS – accessorial liability – whether findings of accessorial liability open with respect to contraventions of ss 727 and 911A – whether declarations and injunctions may be granted when persons knowingly concerned in contraventions are not deemed to be contravenors themselves EVIDENCE – admissibility of transcripts of examinations conducted pursuant to s 19 of the ASIC Act – application of hearsay provisions in Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to tender of transcripts – whether reliance on transcript precluded by ss 68(3) and 76(1)(a) of the ASIC Act – whether proceedings for injunctions under ss 1101B(1) and 1324(1) of the Corporations Act enliven privileges against self-incrimination and self-exposure to penalty – effect of s 1349 of Corporations Act EVIDENCE – admissibility of unauthenticated documents PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – effect of r 16.07 of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – purpose of pleadings
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate