Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator v Countrywide Marketing Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 351 Citation: National Heavy Vehicle Regulator v Countrywide Marketing Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 351
Parties: NATIONAL HEAVY VEHICLE REGULATOR v COUNTRYWIDE MARKETING PTY LTD (ACN 162 535 622), NHVR PTY LTD (ACN 169 150 190) and TIMOTHY AARON O'KEEFE
File number(s): QUD 587 of 2014
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 14 April 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of whether declarations ought to be made in circumstances where judgment is being entered against all respondents in default of obligations cast upon each of the respondents by the Federal Court Rules 2011 and orders of the Court, including default in filing a defence
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 5.23, 16.32
Cases cited: Speedo Holdings BV v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227 – cited Engineered Thermal Systems Pty Ltd v Salmon (In Liq) (2012) FCA 1159 – cited Yeo v Damos Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1129 – cited Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 133 – cited
Date of hearing: 14 April 2015
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr David Logan QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms Anita Sweet (In-House Counsel), National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 587 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate