Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warner v Wong, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liq) (No 3) [2015] FCA 365 Citation: Warner v Wong, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liq) (No 3) [2015] FCA 365
Parties: ANTHONY JOHN WARNER AND STEVEN KUGEL IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 and BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 v ALFRED WONG, SHAN PEI INVESTMENT LIMITED, GOOD TEAM INVESTMENTS LIMITED, GREAT INVESTMENTS LIMITED, OSMOND TZE LEUNG KWOK, HONG XU, ZHI HONG, CHIAH CHEANG LEE, and GUJARAT NRE COKING COAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUJARAT NRE MINERALS LIMITED)
File number: NSD 1063 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 9 March 2015
Date of hearing: 9 March 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: N Cotman SC and S Wells
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Breene & Breene, Solicitors Counsel for the Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Defendants: T Tzovaras Solicitor for the Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Defendants: JT Law t/as Tomaras Lawyers Counsel for the Eighth Defendant: G Stapleton
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate