Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 366 Citation: Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 366
Parties: ARUN NEPAL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 79 of 2015
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for de facto partner to represent applicant – whether de facto partner has a statutory right to make oral submissions – overlap with issue raised on appeal – scope of operation of principle of extended McKenzie friend
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 47B Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 55B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 276, 280 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 4.01(1)
Cases cited: Collier v Hicks (1831) 2 B & Ad 663; 109 ER 1290 Cristovao v Registrar Caporale [2012] FCA 1329 Hubbard Association of Scientologists International v Anderson [1972] VR 340 McKenzie v McKenzie [1970] 3 WLR 472 McLean v Westpac Banking Corporation [2013] FCA 126 Nepal v Minister for Immigration [2014] FCCA 2463 Nepal v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 305 O'Toole v Scott [1965] AC 939 Remely v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 619 Santos v The State of Western Australia [No 2] [2013] WASCA 39 Schagen v The Queen (1993) 8 WAR 410 WACX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1538 Date of hearing: 21 April 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate