Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PrimeSpace Property Investment Ltd v Vienne Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 367 Citation: PrimeSpace Property Investment Ltd v Vienne Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 367
Parties: PRIMESPACE PROPERTY INVESTMENT LIMITED ACN 107 345 317 v VIENNE PTY LIMITED ACN 151 789 972 PRIMESPACE PROPERTY INVESTMENT LIMITED ACN 107 345 317 v DOMA INVESTMENTS (ACT) PTY LIMITED ACN 083 161 451 PRIMESPACE PROPERTY INVESTMENT LIMITED ACN 107 345 317 v JUDITH ANNE JENSEN AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PERIDOT INVESTMENT TRUST ABN 92 780 407 682
File numbers: NSD 1303 of 2014 NSD 1366 of 2014 NSD 9 of 2015
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – applications to extend time for compliance with statutory demands pending proposed appeals – whether appeals have reasonable prospects of success
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459F, 459H, 459J Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24
Cases cited: Aussie Vic Plant Hire Pty Ltd v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (2008) 232 CLR 314 Australian Beverage Distributors Pty Ltd v Cranswick Premium Wines Pty Ltd (2004) 50 ACSR 544 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Elders Trustee & Executor Co Ltd v E G Reeves Pty Ltd (1987) 78 ALR 193 Jem Developments Pty Ltd v Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd (2006) 60 ACSR 393
Date of hearing: 20 April 2015
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate