Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi-Aventis [2015] FCA 384 Citation: Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi-Aventis [2015] FCA 384
Parties: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v SANOFI (FORMERLY SANOFI-AVENTIS), SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB INVESTCO LLC
File number: NSD 1639 of 2007
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 24 April 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether respondents to claim on undertaking as to damages should be given leave to amend points of defence – whether respondents' proposed defences reasonably arguable EQUITY – third party claim by Commonwealth on undertaking as to damages given in support of interlocutory injunction restraining alleged patent infringement – where patent later held invalid – where applicants seek to defend claim on basis that judgment holding patent invalid wrongly decided and that it would therefore be inequitable to permit recovery pursuant to undertaking as to damages – leave to amend to raise such defence refused EQUITY – third party claim on undertaking as to damages – where applicants seek to defend such claim on basis of delay – whether defence based upon failure of Commonwealth to notify possibility of such claim prior to disposition of application for special leave to appeal reasonably arguable – leave to amend to raise such defence refused – whether defence based upon delay occasioning prejudice arising out of loss of evidence sufficiently pleaded – leave to amend to raise such defence granted on terms
Legislation: National Health Act 1953 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 44BA Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment (Copyright) Act 2011 (Cth) Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT) r 21
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate