Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hinton v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 408 Citation: Hinton v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 408
Appeal from: Hinton v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 2505
Parties: PAUL RONALD HINTON v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1221 of 2014
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for a partner visa for dependent child over 18 – Migration Review Tribunal satisfied that child over 18 met the requirements of dependency at the time of the visa application but not at the time of the Tribunal decision – Tribunal found there was 'no information' as to dependency in the six months prior to the Tribunal decision – Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2, cl 309.321 and regs 1.05A and 1.12(1) not satisfied ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether Tribunal breached s 358(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to consider a letter concerning monthly financial payments in the six months prior to the Tribunal's decision – whether information in the letter was probative or cogent – whether Tribunal failed to complete the exercise of its jurisdiction by failing to further investigate contrary to s 359(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal failed to make an obvious inquiry about a critical fact, the existence of which is easily ascertained and which had a sufficient link to the outcome of the review – whether rare and exceptional circumstances – whether further inquiry could have yielded a useful result
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate