Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 416 Citation: Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 416
Parties: JO-ANNE FINCH v THE HEAT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 092 941 430), GILLIAN FRANKLIN, PETER KADLECIK, ADAM WHITE, JOHN SIMCOCKS and DARREN SCOTTI
File number: VID 73 of 2015
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 5 May 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – leave to appeal against interlocutory orders on a matter of practice and procedure – whether substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal was refused - no substantial injustice
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Long Service Leave Act 1992 (Vic) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic)
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Mail Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc and Another (1981) 148 CLR 170 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd and Another v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Finch v Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 88 Finch v The Heat Group [2015] FCA 182 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499
Date of hearing: 20 April 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Felman
Solicitor for the Respondents: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 73 of 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate