Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sage an examiner appointed under s 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 v ZZ [2015] FCA 417 Citation: Sage an examiner appointed under s 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 v ZZ [2015] FCA 417
Parties: GEOFFREY ERNEST (TIM) SAGE AN EXAMINER APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 46B OF THE AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION ACT 2002 v ZZ
File number: NSD 380 of 2014
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 2 April 2015
Catchwords: CONTEMPT – s 34A(c) Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – contempt of the Australian Crime Commission to be determined as if it were a contempt of the Court – whether evidence given to an examiner false to respondent's knowledge in a material particular amounting to a contempt under s 34A(c) of the Act
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth)
Cases cited: The Queen v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618
Date of hearing: 30, 31 March 2015; 1, 2 April 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 84
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms S Maharaj QC with Mr C O'Donnell
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G Scragg
Solicitor for the Respondent: Birchgrove Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 380 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate