Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 429 Citation: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 429
Parties: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680 v SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708, KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600, CITIC PACIFIC LTD and CITIC PACIFIC MINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 119 578 371; SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708 and KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600; MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680
File number: WAD 110 of 2013
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 8 May 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether a view/inspection should be taken at trial – no basis for evidence to be led at inspection – context of inspection being to clarify the nature of subject matter in litigation concerning control of a port in a multi-billion dollar project – application allowed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 53, 53(1), 53(2), 53(3)(a), 53(3)(b), 53(3)(c), 53(3)(e) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 14.03
Cases cited: Evans v The Queen [2007] HCA 59; (2007) 235 CLR 521 London General Omnibus Company Ltd v Lavell [1900] 1 Ch 135 R v Delon (1992) 29 NSWLR 29 Scott v The President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Numurkah [1954] HCA 14; (1954) 91 CLR 300
Date of hearing: 8 May 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate