Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reaper v Luxton [2015] FCA 430 Citation: Reaper v Luxton [2015] FCA 430
Parties: BRETT REAPER v REGISTRAR TIM LUXTON
File number: VID 119 of 2015
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 11 May 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether a Deputy District Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia erred in decision made pursuant to Rule 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to reject an interlocutory application submitted for filing – whether filing of interlocutory application constitutes abuse of process
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1976 (Cth) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 153B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A(5) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: Druett v Segal [2011] FCA 1191 – cited Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 13 – cited Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 426 – cited Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 729 – cited Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Limited (2010) 268 ALR 222 – cited Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 – cited
Date of hearing: 1 May 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate