Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 4) [2015] FCA 465 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 4) [2015] FCA 465
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v EMMANUEL GEORGE CASSIMATIS and JULIE GLADYS CASSIMATIS
File number: QUD 574 of 2010
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – third party application for inspection of affidavits – meaning and effect of reading affidavits in open court – leave granted to third party to inspect affidavits read in open court
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32(2)(m), 2.32(4)
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Solicitor for the Respondents: Russells
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 574 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: EMMANUEL GEORGE CASSIMATIS
First Respondent
JULIE GLADYS CASSIMATIS
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDELMAN J DATE OF ORDER: 14 MAY 2015 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Inspection of four affidavits permitted. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 574 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate