Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZZES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCA 482 Citation: MZZES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCA 482
Appeal from: MZZES v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection & Anor [2014] FCCA 758
Parties: MZZES v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 256 of 2014
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 18 May 2015
Cases cited: MZZES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 397
Date of hearing: In Chambers
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Solicitor for the Appellant: Mr A Ambikaipalan of Ambi Associates
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr O Young of Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 256 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MZZES
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 18 MAY 2015 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The original form of [8] and [9] in the reasons for judgment in this matter, delivered on 29 April 2015, be redacted in the form of Schedule A to these orders. The redacted form of the reasons for judgment shall be the published form. 2. The original copies of the judgment that were handed down in Court on 29 April 2015, and any subsequent copies of the original form of judgment in the possession of the parties, be returned to the Court by Wednesday 27 May 2015. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate