Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Delnas Metal Roofing Pty Ltd v Australian Capital Territory [2015] FCA 496 Citation: Delnas Metal Roofing Pty Ltd v Australian Capital Territory [2015] FCA 496
Parties: DELNAS METAL ROOFING PTY LTD (ACN 102 346 725) v AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
File number: ACD 68 of 2013
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 20 May 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the applicant should be given leave to amend the latest iteration of its Statement of Claim – whether the applicant's pleaded contract case should be dismissed
Legislation: Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) Fair Trading (Australian Consumer Law) Act 1992 (ACT) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011, r 26.01(1)
Cases cited: Spencer v The Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118
Date of hearing: 2 and 16 May 2014
Place: Sydney (via video link to Canberra) (heard in Canberra)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 73
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr GJ Blank
Solicitor for the Applicant: Trinity Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr RP Clynes
Counsel for the Respondent: ACT Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 68 of 2013
BETWEEN: DELNAS METAL ROOFING PTY LTD (ACN 102 346 725)
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Respondent
JUDGE: FOSTER J DATE OF ORDER: 20 MAY 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate