Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 499 Citation: Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 499
Appeal from: Nepal v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 305
Parties: ARUN NEPAL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 79 of 2015
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether Migration Act provisions concerning "immigration assistance" provide a positive right for a non-lawyer sponsor to represent applicant in court – circumstances in which "compelling and compassionate circumstances" must be considered – whether Tribunal was bound to accept expert evidence in its conclusion on the ultimate issue – whether judge was required to call sponsor to give evidence – effect of failure to notify applicant of Minister's decision on a visa application – whether Tribunal afforded natural justice – sponsor's desire to make submissions by extension of the concept of a McKenzie friend
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) ss 44, 44(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 55A, 55B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5CB(1), 5CB(2), 5CB(3), 31(3), 276, 276(1), 276(2), s 276(2)(c), 276(2A), 276(3), 276(4), 277, 280, 280(1), 280(1A), 280(2), 280(3), 280(4), 280(5), 280(5A), 280(5B), 280(5C), 280(6), 280(7), 349(1), 359AA, 359AA(b)(iii), 359A, 359A(1), 359A(3), 359A(4), 359A(4)(b), 360(a), 360(b), 379A, 467 Migration Legislation Amendment (Migration Agents Integrity Measures) Act 2004 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.09A, 1.09A(1), 1.09A(2), 1.09A(3), 1.09A(3)(d)(iv), 2.03(1), 2.03A, 2.03A(1), 2.03A(2), 2.03A(3), 2.03A(3)(b), 2.03A(4), 2.03A(5), 2.03AA; Sch 2; cl 801.221, 801.221(1), 801.221(2), 801.221(2A), 801.221(3), 801.221(4), 801.221(5), 801.221(6), 801.221(8), 820.21, 820.211(2), 820.211(2)(a)(i) High Court Rules 2004 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 4.01(1) Cases cited: Chen v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 1137; (2013) 218 FCR 561 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; 206 CLR 323 Nepal v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 2463 Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 305 Nepal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 366 Obacelo Pty Ltd v Taveraft Pty Ltd (1986) 10 FCR 518 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Re Enoch and Zaretsky Bock & Co [1910] 1 KB 327 Remely v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 619
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate