Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tsapatolis v Fuji Xerox Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 514 Citation: Tsapatolis v Fuji Xerox Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 514
Parties: ELENA TSAPATOLIS v FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA LTD T/AS FUJI XEROX
File number: VID 420 of 2014
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2015
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE – client legal privilege – whether statement gave rise to a waiver of privilege COSTS – costs sought under s 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether the making of the application was an unreasonable act
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 122(3)(a) Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) s 122(3)(a) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 570(1), 570(2)(b)
Cases cited: Ampolex Limited v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd (1996) 137 ALR 28 – cited Bennett v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service (2004) 140 FCR 101 – cited Lactalis Jindi Pty Ltd v Jindi Cheese Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 475 – distinguished Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 – cited Saxena v PPF Asset Management Limited [2011] FCA 39 – cited Secretary, Department of Justice v Osland (2007) 95 ALD 380 – cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms F I O'Brien QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Max Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr N Harrington
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate