Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shirvington v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2015] FCA 522 Citation: Shirvington v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2015] FCA 522
Appeal from: Commonwealth of Australia v Shirvington [2015] FCCA 1270
Parties: KEN SHIRVINGTON v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 539 of 2015
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 28 May 2015
Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT – whether conduct of landlord sufficient foundation for claim for injunction PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether leave to appeal should be granted
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) ss 50, 52, 94
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298
Date of hearing: 22 May 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P King
Solicitor for the Applicant: VL Macri Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr DW Rayment and Mr J Doyle
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 539 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: KEN SHIRVINGTON
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 28 MAY 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate