Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hill on behalf of the Yirendali People Core Country Claim v State of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 538 Citation: Hill on behalf of the Yirendali People Core Country Claim v State of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 538
Parties: JAMES HILL & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE YIRENDALI PEOPLE CORE COUNTRY CLAIM v STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS
File number: QUD 495 of 2006
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 15 May 2015
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – practice and procedure – whether trial of separate question going to existence of native title in claim area should be vacated in light of statement by applicant that it would not be calling any evidence – where applicant had been afforded procedural fairness in terms of a full opportunity to make its case – whether substantive native title application should be dismissed by interlocutory application by respondents – where interests of respondents disparate in nature and there is a need to allow each respondent time to consider its position and seek consequential orders – trial vacated and matter adjourned for further directions and hearing of any consequential application arising from applicant's statement
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 87
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate