Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 542 Citation: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 542
Parties: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680 v SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708, KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600, CITIC PACIFIC LTD and CITIC PACIFIC MINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 119 578 371; SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708 and KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600; MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA
File number: WAD 110 of 2013
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to intervene – relevant principles on application for intervention under r 9.12 considered – meaning of "direct interest" – sufficient interest in the proceedings to intervene – leave to intervene granted
Legislation: Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2002 (WA) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.12
Cases cited: Comcare v Martinez [2013] FCA 160 Congoo v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 1113 Hua Wang Bank v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 28 Levy v Victoria [1997] HCA 31; (1997) 189 CLR 579 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v The Honourable Warden K Tavener [2014] WASC 420 News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd [1996] FCA 870 Pegang Mining Co Ltd v Choong Sam [1969] 2 MLJ 52 Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited [2011] HCA 54; (2011) 248 CLR 37 Date of hearing: 2 June 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate