Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mulligan v National Disability Insurance Agency [2015] FCA 544 Citation: Mulligan v National Disability Insurance Agency [2015] FCA 544
Appeal from: Mulligan v National Disability Insurance Agency [2014] AATA 374
Parties: DALE MULLIGAN v NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE AGENCY
File number: NSD 693 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether applicant had a substantially reduced functional capacity to undertake any of the activities in s 24(1)(c) National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) – deeming effect of r 5.8 National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2013 (Cth) – whether global finding sufficient – failure by Tribunal to perform statutory task – decision set aside and review remitted ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether adequate reasons given by Tribunal – failure by Tribunal to disclose in its reasons the evidence on which findings were based – even if first question of law not answered favourably to the applicant, the Court would be inclined to set aside decision and remit the review for failure to give adequate reasons
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43(2), 43(2B), 44, 44(7) National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) ss 13, 24(1), 24(1)(c), Ch 3 Pt 2 National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2013 (Cth), r 5.8 Revised Explanatory Memorandum, National Disability Insurance Scheme Bill 2013 (Cth) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Opened for signature 30 March 2007. 2515 UNTS 3 at Art 1 (entered into force 3 May 2008)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate