Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 5) [2015] FCA 571 Citation: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 5) [2015] FCA 571
Parties: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680 v SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708, KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600, CITIC PACIFIC LTD and CITIC PACIFIC MINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 119 578 371; SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708 and KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600; MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA
File number: WAD 110 of 2013
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2015
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – admissibility of expert evidence – whether the evidence is relevant to the facts in issue – whether the evidence is in the correct form – whether the expert sufficiently sets out the basis of justifiable assumptions
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 135, 136 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 23.13
Cases cited: Clambake Pty Ltd v Tipperary Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] WASC 244; (2007) 35 WAR 394 Makita (Aust) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Tyneside Property Management Pty Ltd v Hammersmith Management Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 395 Date of hearing: 8 June 2015
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate