Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mulhern v Bank of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 579 Citation: Mulhern v Bank of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 579
Parties: EMER MARIE MULHERN, JACQUELINE PATRICIA MULHERN, PINNACLE INDUSTRIES 11LLC, ANDREW QUINERT T/AS ANDREW Q PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, MULHERN BUILDERS LTD IRE, CELTIC PACIFIC CONTRACTORS LLIC, EMERALD HERVEY BAY DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD, TOOWONG PRIME INVESTMENTS PTY LTD, MULHERN'S PROPERTIES INC, COUGAN CORPORATION PTY LTD and MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN v BANK OF QUEENSLAND
File number: NSD 887 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – where proceedings involved multiple claims in respect of which no cause of action was identified – where claims involve abuses of process – costs awarded on indemnity basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43
Cases cited: Degmam Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc [2004] FCA 1251; (2004) 51 ACSR 555 Growth Equities Corporation Ltd v Genesis Growth Investments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1302 Mulhern v Bank of Queensland [2015] FCA 44 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Re Smith; Ex parte Rundle (No 2) (1991) 6 WAR 299 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2009] FCAFC 166; (2009) 182 FCR 160
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate