Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Trio Brothers Trading Pty Ltd v Road Runner Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 610 Citation: Trio Brothers Trading Pty Ltd v Road Runner Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 610
Parties: TRIO BROTHERS TRADING PTY LTD (ACN 079 259 279) v ROAD RUNNER COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 083 778 670) and HASSAN MERIE (ALSO KNOWN AS SAM MERIE)
File number: QUD 538 of 2014
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for summary dismissal refused and substantive proceedings transferred to Victorian District Registry – formal written submissions as to costs made – whether order for costs of and incidental to interlocutory application should be made or reserved pending determination of substantive appeal – whether circumstances warrant departure from usual order that costs follow the event – s 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – costs of and incidental to interlocutory application to be paid on party-party basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Trio Brothers Trading Pty Ltd v Road Runner Company Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 374
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B Fitzpatrick
Solicitor for the Applicant: Dov Silberman Lawyer
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate