Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Refund Property Fees Pty Ltd v Prime Project Development (Cairns) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 613 Citation: Refund Property Fees Pty Ltd v Prime Project Development (Cairns) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 613
Parties: REFUND PROPERTY FEES PTY LTD ACN 145 709 360 v PRIME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 109 685 332, PROMOSEVEN PTY LTD ACN 102 606 324 and BLUECHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 117 021 566 REFUND PROPERTY FEES PTY LTD ACN 145 709 360 v NIGEL ROBERT MARKEY, BRADLEY VINCENT HELLEN, PROMOSEVEN PTY LTD ACN 102 606 324 and PRIME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 109 685 332 PROMOSEVEN PTY LTD ACN 102 606 324 v NIGEL ROBERT MARKEY AND BRADLEY VINCENT HELLEN IN THEIR CAPACITY AS RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS AND LIQUIDATORS OF BLUECHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 117 021 566, REFUND PROPERTY FEES PTY LTD ACN 145 709 360 and PRIME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 109 685 332
File numbers: QUD 172 of 2011 QUD 227 of 2013 QUD 230 of 2013
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 11 May 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS LAW – insolvency – secured debts – hearing on remission following appeal from rejection of proof of debt – where settlement agreement reached prior to hearing – discharge of receivers – whether to dispense with requirement for filing of accounts by receivers under r 14.25(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 14.25(1)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate