Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Berryman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 616 Citation: Berryman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 616
Parties: JEROME WAYNE ANARU BERRYMAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
File number: NSD 13 of 2015
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 23 June 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – risk to Australian community – a mandatory consideration – risk of recidivism – the personal circumstances of the claimant ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – reasons to be construed in a common-sense manner – inherent danger in comparing reasons given in different cases
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 4.12 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 499, 501, 501(1), 501(2), 501(6), 501(7), 501G(1)
Cases cited: Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83 Brown v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 75 Fraser v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1333 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26, (2014) 310 ALR 1 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18, (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh [2004] FCAFC 256, (2004) 139 FCR 505 Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 54 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38, (2014) 220 FCR 1 Roesner v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 68 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673, (2014) 225 FCR 424
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate