Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Farag [2015] FCA 646 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Farag [2015] FCA 646
Appeal from: Farag and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] AATA 927
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION v MINA MOUNIR FARAG and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 37 of 2015
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2015
Catchwords: CITIZENSHIP – appeal on a question of law from Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) – whether a person eligible to become an Australian citizen under s 21(2) – general residence requirement in s 22 – where person does not satisfy the general residence requirement that he was not present in Australia as an unlawful non-citizen at any time during the period of 4 years immediately before the day he made the application to the Minister to become an Australian citizen – statutory discretion in s 22(4A) to treat a period as one in which the person was not present in Australia as an unlawful non-citizen if the Minister considers the person was present in Australia during that period but, because of an administrative error, was an unlawful non-citizen during that period – Tribunal found letter from Department to person to be an administrative error and because of that the person became an unlawful non-citizen – whether error of law on the part of the Tribunal – whether Tribunal misconstrued "administrative error" – whether Tribunal applied a wrong test in determining whether the person had become an unlawful non-citizen "because of" an administrative error – whether evidence included probative material
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate