Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Munswamy v Australian Postal Corporation [2015] FCA 678 Citation: Munswamy v Australian Postal Corporation [2015] FCA 678
Appeal from: Ishwari Munswamy and Australian Postal Corporation [2014] AATA 757
Parties: ISHWARI MUNSWAMY v AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
File number: NSD 1229 of 2014
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – questions of law – whether Tribunal erred – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 5A(1), 14(1)
Cases cited: Abrahams v Comcare [2006] FCA 1829; (2006) 93 ALD 147 Comcare v Etheridge [2006] FCAFC 27; (2006) 149 FCR 522 Comcare v Martinez (No 2) [2013] FCA 439; (2013) 212 FCR 272 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92 Kennedy v Comcare [2014] FCA 82; (2014) 63 AAR 100 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSNW [2014] FCAFC 145 Munswamy and Australian Postal Commission [2014] AATA 757 O'Kane v Comcare [2014] FCA 341; (2014) 221 FCR 482 Telstra Corporation Limited v Hannaford [2006] FCAFC 87; (2006) 151 FCR 253
Date of hearing: 17 June 2015
Date of last submissions: 6 July 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 56
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate