Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Architecture HQ Pty Ltd v Propertylinc Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 686 Citation: Architecture HQ Pty Ltd v Propertylinc Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 686
Parties: ARCHITECTURE HQ PTY LTD (ACN 105 110 772) v PROPERTYLINC PTY LTD (ACN 114 649 731), DP TOSCANO ARCHITECTS PTY LTD (ACN 120 090 691) and SUMMERHILL SHOPPING CENTRE PTY LTD (ACN 124 197 128)
File number: VID 339 of 2015
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for freezing order under r 7.35 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) — application for ancillary order under r 7.33 of the Rules — identification of appropriate test — whether good arguable case — whether real risk of dissipation of assets — whether mere possibility of dissipation suffices — absence of solid evidence in support of finding of real risk — application dismissed.
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 36(1), 115(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.32, 7.33(1), 7.35, 7.35(4)
Cases cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (2010) 273 ALR 194 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Curtis v NID Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1072
Date of hearing: 29 June 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate