Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Crocker v Toys 'R' Us (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 727 Citation: Crocker v Toys 'R' Us (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 727
Parties: DEBRA ANN CROCKER v TOYS 'R' US (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD, BABY ZONE (AUST) PTY LTD and THE BABY PROJECT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LP
File number: QUD 647 of 2014
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 11 June 2015
Date of hearing: 11 June 2015
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Crocker appeared in person
Counsel for the former First Respondent: Mr Ferrett
Solicitor for the former First Respondent: Chrysiliou Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 647 of 2014
BETWEEN: DEBRA ANN CROCKER
Applicant
AND: TOYS 'R' US (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Second Respondent
BABY ZONE (AUST) PTY LTD
Third Respondent
THE BABY PROJECT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LP
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 11 JUNE 2015 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application filed by the applicant on 25 May 2015 is dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 647 of 2014
BETWEEN: DEBRA ANN CROCKER
Applicant
AND: TOYS 'R' US (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate