Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gemini Industries Pty Limited v Oceano Bathroom Pty Limited [2015] FCA 732 Citation: Gemini Industries Pty Limited v Oceano Bathroom Pty Limited [2015] FCA 732
Parties: GEMINI INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (ACN 079 297 617) and MARBLETREND PTY LIMITED (ACN 109 273 912) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) v OCEANO BATHROOM PTY LIMITED (ACN 604 482 206), DIRECT BUILDING PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 151 440 845), MICHAEL LEE and ROBERT WALTON
File number: NSD 707 of 2015
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs of an aborted application for interlocutory injunctive relief should be paid by the applicants
Date of hearing: 16 July 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J O'Sullivan
Solicitor for the Applicants: Benjamin-Nicholson-Law
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J Knackstredt
Solicitor for the Respondents: Macpherson & Kelley Lawyers (Sydney) Pty Limited
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 707 of 2015
BETWEEN: GEMINI INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (ACN 079 297 617)
First Applicant
MARBLETREND PTY LIMITED (ACN 109 273 912) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION)
Second Applicant
AND: OCEANO BATHROOM PTY LIMITED (ACN 604 482 206)
First Respondent
DIRECT BUILDING PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 151 440 845)
Second Respondent
MICHAEL LEE
Third Respondent
ROBERT WALTON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate